On Wed, 04 Dec 2002, Ceki Gülc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What am I missing?
Not sure whether you are missing anything at all. I don't understand the US copyright law that well (I could tell you a lot about the German law, but still IANAL). But from you quoting Roy: >> The problem with the 1.1 license is that it lacked a way to >> define the scope of what was covered beyond "this file". As >> such, the board has not approved its use by reference for our own >> products. I think, the last sentence is why we should stick to the full license text until using some short form is OK with License 2.0. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
