On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Ceki G�lc� wrote:
> At 12:13 04.12.2002 +0100, you wrote: > > > >Ceki G�lc� wrote: > >>At 11:06 04.12.2002 +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >> ... > >To stop this once and for all, since it seems that having a short license > >is very important for some (still don't know why), I've sent a request for > >clarification to the board too. > > The license (version 1.1) is 41 lines long whereas the copyright notice > plus the reference to the license is just 7 lines. All this fuss is about 34 lines of text? I don't get it. Why not just use the full license and forget about whether or not the short form is OK? -- Martin Cooper > > >-- > >Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Ceki > > TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be > conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from > others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793 > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
