What I was thinking of for projects is something like:
+----------------+ |=Projects=======| +--Subprojects---+ | * Alexandia | | * etc... | +--Graduated-----+ | * Ant | | * etc... | +----------------+
I have two concerns with this: It takes up more space and nothing else uses subheadings. It does put Graduated into context with a noun, though.
My concern is that most users don't care about TLP vs Jakarta owned. So, does the terminology 'graduated' help? Why does the user care that some projects started at Jakarta, while other Java projects didn't?
Unless and until Jakarta can become a Java portal @ Apache we have to deal with this though. It would seem to me that 'Related' was a looser word for these projects, and allows us to include other projects that didn't start at Jakarta.
Also, I don't see any need to use a noun/subheadings here. For me, 'Related' on its own would be a sufficient defintion.
Stephen
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
