On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about > the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a > consensus. opinions? <snap/>
An informal thread was here [ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-general&m=111972374202676&w=2 ], where I believe the majority opted for "Web Components". While it would be nice, I doubt this is going to be unanimous. Unless there are other suggestions, or someone else beats me to it, I will call a vote in 24 hours. I plan to keep it simple, mark X before the name that appeals most to you. On 8/8/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > AIUI everything will be flat: collective management and only social > > divisions. standard taglibs will become a jakarta sub-project. > > +1, I agree. <snip/> +1 On 8/8/05, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > Regarding the other taglibs, I agree, it might make more sense for all > of them to be direct sub-projects of the new project, instead of having > an intermediate taglibs sub-project. But that's something we can decide > later one - as we (the Jakarta Taglibs project) decided that we should > create new taglibs from scratch (using the legacy code), the structure > wouldn't matter at this point. <snap/> I will call a vote on taglibs-dev today. While it seems we are agreeing on the flat hierarchy, this is, IMO, important enough to close for the Taglibs project before moving forward. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
