On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip/> > > IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about > > the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a > > consensus. opinions? > <snap/>
Is there any interest in resolving the name issue as mentioned below? I think everyone's perception of the methodology used is key to a swift resolution, so it'd be nice to flesh out what the method should be. -Rahul > While it > would be nice, I doubt this is going to be unanimous. Unless there are > other suggestions, or someone else beats me to it, I will call a vote > in 24 hours. I plan to keep it simple, mark X before the name that > appeals most to you. <snip/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
