On 8/9/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip/> > > > IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about > > > the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a > > > consensus. opinions? > > <snap/> > > Is there any interest in resolving the name issue as mentioned below? > I think everyone's perception of the methodology used is key to a > swift resolution, so it'd be nice to flesh out what the method should > be.
Yes. We need to pick a name ASAP so that we can get the new subproject off the ground with its own mailing lists, SVN repo, etc. The problem is that the list of candidate names, as it is now, is rather long, which could make for a somewhat messy vote. Therefore, I'd like to propose removing some of those candidate names prior to a vote: * Remove anything that has "potential conflict". Let's just not go there. * Remove League, Confederation and Bloc. I honestly don't think those are serious names. * I would also recommend removing Weblets, since this suggests a uniformity of structure that simply won't be there. That would still leave us with quite a few options to choose among. -- Martin Cooper > -Rahul > > > While it > > would be nice, I doubt this is going to be unanimous. Unless there are > > other suggestions, or someone else beats me to it, I will call a vote > > in 24 hours. I plan to keep it simple, mark X before the name that > > appeals most to you. > <snip/> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
