On 8/9/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > All would be describable (assuming no clashes) as: > > Apache Jakarta Web Components > Apache Web Components > > There's the option of doing W*4J or something, but we can discuss that > later I think as it's just an altered presentation of the chosen name. <snap/>
Agreed, plus I'm not too keen to see a Java tie-in with the name, given the current scope of the sub-project. We have other programming models even in the starter set. On 8/9/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For what it's worth, I actually like Silk a great deal... in fact, I'd > go ahead and give it my non-binding +1... <snip/> If there is a connection to be drawn, I think many probably won't ;-) I'd refrain from voting until a formal thread appears on the subject. I know its hard ;-) but voting now will make it tougher to tally opinions from multiple threads. Hen has taken the lead to call a vote [ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-general&m=112361926416536&w=2 ], shouldn't be too long a wait. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
