On 8/9/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Prior to calling a vote tomorrow, am I missing any potential names. This > is all I dredged out of the previous mail thread. 'webapp' was mentioned > instead of 'web'; but didn't seem to get any traction. > > ------------------------ > web bricks > web components > web parts (NOTE-1) > web commons (NOTE-2) > ------------------------
Some other names were added to the wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/CreatingCommonsForWebComponents That would probably add: - web libs - web tools to your list above. (I'm not sure how appropriate 'web libs' would be though, since I'm not sure I'd refer to, say, a compression filter as a 'library'.) -- Martin Cooper > All would be describable (assuming no clashes) as: > > Apache Jakarta Web Components > Apache Web Components > > There's the option of doing W*4J or something, but we can discuss that > later I think as it's just an altered presentation of the chosen name. > > NOTE-1 > ====== > Web parts would clash with javawebparts.sf.net name-wise and while the > owner of this loose trademark is interested in being involved, we wouldn't > really know until the code was looked at etc. > > Also Web parts appears to be a Microsoft term (google for it); which will > definitely cause problems if our definition of Web Parts is different to > theirs. > > NOTE-2 > ====== > Despite the suitability of this name, we are hesitant to duplicate the > Commons brand and confuse the user. > > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
