Prior to calling a vote tomorrow, am I missing any potential names. This
is all I dredged out of the previous mail thread. 'webapp' was mentioned
instead of 'web'; but didn't seem to get any traction.
------------------------
web bricks
web components
web parts (NOTE-1)
web commons (NOTE-2)
------------------------
All would be describable (assuming no clashes) as:
Apache Jakarta Web Components
Apache Web Components
There's the option of doing W*4J or something, but we can discuss that
later I think as it's just an altered presentation of the chosen name.
NOTE-1
======
Web parts would clash with javawebparts.sf.net name-wise and while the
owner of this loose trademark is interested in being involved, we wouldn't
really know until the code was looked at etc.
Also Web parts appears to be a Microsoft term (google for it); which will
definitely cause problems if our definition of Web Parts is different to
theirs.
NOTE-2
======
Despite the suitability of this name, we are hesitant to duplicate the
Commons brand and confuse the user.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
