On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit on what the physical / visual-to-users
differences to the current commons, well, Jakarta sub-project will be
? Will this be a new Jakarta sub-project (and the other commons
components will remain in the current commons one) ?
I've been trying to dodge this question. Why? Because I want to encourage
other groupings (especially from commons) to self-select. If I make a
proposal, then it will be an imposition.
This one is a bit of a catch-22.
I've definitely warmed to this point - we need to be encouraging people to
start talking about groupings, not to try and partition Jakarta based on
some architectual schematic.
However - if felt of ourselves as a single community - there wouldn't be
an imposition from suggesting what you wanted to do with the code that
you, as a PMC member, are responsible for (ie all of Jakarta). As it is
the suggestion that your opinion on Velocity counts for as much as
Nathan's opinion on Velocity feels unhealthy.
This is when consensus would have to come in. I could suggest Jakarta
Scripting Components:
Velocity [not dvsl or anakia]
EL
Jelly
BSF
but people are going to happily disagree and point out why I'm wrong.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
