i like the idea of tagging emails better: a single list with cool server side filtering and metrics. we don't have the technology for this yet soi'm willing to see the mailing lists split so long as people would be willing to consider coming back if it every arrives...I was just considering proposing exactly this!
A joke turns into something serious ...but I am all with you guys. As I said: the more I think about it - the more I like the idea! The another really cool feature with this tagging approach would be that cross-posting would no longer need to be banned - it would just not exist.
A set of checkboxes would allow a user to "subscribe" to various lists, or to virtual groupings such as "jakarta commons" which would implicitlysubscribe to the list for every project that is tagged as being ajakarta-commons project. Of course this implies fine-grained email lists(ie one for each project); the problems of partitioning the subscriber base too much is avoided by the existence of the groupings.
Yepp!
This system would allow overlapping groups to occur; for example commons-digester can be filed under both "commons" and "xml" virtual groups; someone subscribing to *either* group would receive digester-related emails. It also allows projects to move from one PMCto another without destroying the existing community (which *is* the setof people receiving emails).
Great possibilites
Groups also allow new projects to be created and added to the group; allpeople subscribed to the group would then automatically get emails related to that new project. Any list which has less than 3 subscribers would automatically forward its emails to the PMC list (or similar) for purposes of oversight.
interesting
Any person subscribed to 3 or more projects associated with "commons" would automatically be subscribed to the whole commons group (or maybe just sent a weekly nag email recommending they do so). That hopefully allows casual commons developers to get just postings for one or two projects, without destroying the useful commons-wide community that exists now.Having a single point for managing subscriptions would also help greatlywith something that regularly frustrates me: suspending subscription when I'm away on holiday. Currently, I need to unsubscribe to half-a-dozen lists then resubscribe on return.
Yepp! Another thing that would be awesome is to integrate it with a powerful archive system ...and then provide feeds for all the different tag combinations - and even individual threads! Man - that would be awesome!
This sort of functionality probably already exists in one of theopen-source mailing list management packages; it isn't anything radicalas far as I can see.
Now we only have to find such a project and then convince infrastructure ...regarding the forums - naaaaa. What does that help? I hate the fact I always have to subscribe to forums and never liked the interfaces. cheers -- Torsten
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
