On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Yoav Shapira wrote:

I think the separation is valid.  Jim put it nicely earlier today
(paraphrased here): committership is the right to vote a code base,
PMC membership is the right to oversee a project.  In my mind there
definitely is a separation, and the latter requires more trust.  This

Committers don't get the right to vote a code base though. They might under some interpretations etc etc, but currently most of the ASF is going with PMC=binding vote, committer=non-binding. What is involved with the right to oversee a project beyond voting?

is especially true for projects whose committership is granted (at
first maybe) on a partial basis, e.g. only to some directory trees
within the project's SVN repository.  So if I were to go just with
that, I'd say -0 (if only because I don't have the energy and
bandwidth to contribute alternative suggestions, so I don't want to -1
the issue).

*whistle while staring at feet*

POI's the only part of Jakarta with partial committership now.

You mentioned that we're bad at remembering to add people to the PMC:
agreed, but I don't think the solution to that is a policy-level one.

It's not the only reason though - and my solution equals zero work compared to the still required work of a script to spit out etc (Geir's done that already, though it might have been CVS days).

The above said, I think Jakarta is a different beast.  Because it's an
umbrella project, it has many disparate groups of people doing their
own thing.  In a nicer world, those smaller groups would be
responsible for their oversight, so we'd have multiple smaller PMCs
instead of one big Jakarta one.  And I think that's where we're
heading gradually, as we graduate projects, make them dormant, move
them elsewhere, etc.

Was a different beast. Disjoint umbrellas are an endangered species now - umbrellas are good, but they need to be one community. A disjoint umbrella means that Martin ends up being the main communication line between subprojects; which'll burn him out.

That said - we are always going to have a lot of people not on the PMC. We have 400+ committers, and they're mostly inactive and I'd be surprised if even a small number wanted to be on the PMC. That's just a legacy bit that once we've invited them we can ignore.

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to