On 30/05/07, Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
> The NOTICE file is not supposed to contain any licenses.
I beg to differ, but I will not go into this again.
> I suggest you remove the Xerox license header from it, and add it to
> the LICENSE file, with the appropriate introduction.
The LICENSE.txt file is supposed to contain the ASL 2.0 and nothing
else.
I don't think that is correct.
The reference to copying the AL 2.0 file to the LICENSE file in
http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new
relates to creating the initial LICENSE file - it does not say that
the LICENSE file cannot contain anything else.
I created another file LICENSE.xerox and refer to it from the
NOTICE file.
It needs either to be referenced in or actually in the LICENSE file.
> Sorry to keep going on about this, but there's only one other file to edit.
Actually, it's more than that.
Not necessarily.
It's your choice as to whether to append the Xerox license to the
LICENSE file or put it in a separate file and edit LICENSE to refer to
it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
