Here I'd been thinking about discussing the NY Times article cited by Roger
at tonight's NYCJUG, but it fell off the list.

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:43 PM, bob therriault <[email protected]>wrote:

> Sorry, I hadn't listened to the entire discussion before I posted.
>
> Even more pertinent are the last 12 minutes where the effect of 'number
> words' in language indicates a greater potential for conceptually
> development of mathematics. The final thoughts in the last minute of the
> video indicate that it may be possible to unlock cognitive abilities by
> describing numbers in different ways. I would think that would suggest that
> learning an array language such as J would be a requirement for true
> programming expertise.
>
> Cheers, bob
>
> On 2010-10-12, at 10:03 AM, bob therriault wrote:
>
> > This video discussion of the effect of language on thought, recently
> appeared on 3 quarks daily, a philosophy science blog.
> >
> >
> http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2010/10/language-and-thought.html
> >
> > At about the 12 minute mark, differences in Russian and English speakers'
> perception of the colour blue is noted, possibly due to the fact that
> Russian has two words for blue and English has one. If language affects
> cognition at this very low level of processing, it would suggest that higher
> levels such as problem solving would be even more influenced by the ways
> ideas are described.
> >
> > Cheers, bob
> >
> > On 2010-10-12, at 7:36 AM, Roger Hui wrote:
> >
> >> There is another presentation of the same idea in
> >>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/magazine/29language-t.htm?pagewanted=all
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Stephen Taylor <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 5:32
> >> Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Looking for links - online or off - between J
> and natural language (example: English).
> >> To: General forum <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>> Linda
> >>>
> >>> I'd be interested to publish in *Vector* anything you write on
> >>> this topic.
> >>>
> >>> Don't know if this is helpful, but a while back we blogged about
> >>> a professor
> >>> at Stanford working close to this field
> >>>
> >>> http://vectoreditor.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-language-shapes-
> >>> thought.html
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Stephen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 3 October 2010 10:14, linda falkoff
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks so much Roger and Brian - I plan to click on the links,
> >>> and hope to
> >>>> come back re the work on "software linguistics" Adin and I
> >>> were doing in
> >>>> the
> >>>> 80's and happily interacting with Ken and APL as well - I note
> >>> online that
> >>>> sl field has taken off (in a good sense) and there are likely
> >>> connections.>
> >>>> Also it may be interesting to take pics of the "Claim
> >>> Structure Grammars" I
> >>>> built for my computing / info. sci  advisor Ted Glaser in
> >>> the 70's,
> >>>>  because
> >>>> it would be very nice if it relates generally to J.  I
> >>> want to carry forth
> >>>> with the "family" projects. Will be pleased to partner in studies,
> >>>> conversations ...
> >>>>
> >>>> You give a lot of clues .. very nice.
> >>>>
> >>>> LDMF.
> >>>> *Respectful Interfaces* . When googling use quotes!
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Roger Hui
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Welcome to the J Forums, Linda.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As far as Ken's work, there isn't much explicitly written
> >>>>> on the subject.  I know of the following items:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - http://keiapl.org/anec/#algebra
> >>>>> from "Algebra: An Algorithmic Treatment", 1972.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - He modeled the organization of the dictionary part
> >>>>> of "J Introduction and Dictionary"
> >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/contents.htm
> >>>>> and before that "A Dictionary of APL",
> >>>>> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=36983.36984
> >>>>> on the organization of an English dictionary,
> >>>>> in particular the American Heritage Dictionary of the
> >>>>> English Language.  (Earlier versions were called
> >>>>> "A Dictionary of the APL Language" and "The ISI
> >>>>> [Iverson Software Inc.] Dictionary of J")
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Of course, he uses noun/verb/adverb etc.
> >>>>> where more traditionally in this context the
> >>>>> terms array/function/operator are used.
> >>>>> This has been very helpful as for example most
> >>>>> every one gets "adverb" (run quickly, eat quickly, ...;
> >>>>> run quickly, run slowly, run directly, ...) whereas
> >>>>> "operator" tends to be confusing and mysterious.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: linda falkoff <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Date: Friday, October 1, 2010 7:43
> >>>>> Subject: [Jgeneral] Looking for links - online or off -
> >>> between J and
> >>>>> natural language (example: English).
> >>>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>> Cc: [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Best wishes up front -
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and can you please share some links you like on the topic
> >>> of J
> >>>>>> and natural
> >>>>>> language, English or otherwise?
> >>>>>> Sorry, post is redundant with email  subject line.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Many thanks, LDMF, *Respectful Interfaces*.
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
Devon McCormick, CFA
^me^ at acm.
org is my
preferred e-mail
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to