Oops, I accidentally trimmed my footnotes.

Johann Hibschman <[email protected]>
writes:

> Ian Clark <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Can you please keep notes of your stumbles with the existing
>> documentation? Feel free to pm me with them. There will be questions
>> you'll have that you simply would not think to ask in a couple of
>> months. This does not invalidate them.
>
> I've been playing with J for almost two years now, ever since I switched
> jobs and no longer had q/kdb+ available[1], and I still feel like I don't
> have a good grasp of how the "system" side of J works.
>
> By that, I mean things like the details of name resolution in
> load/require[2], what verbs are defined in _z_, what is available in the
> various packages, etc.  I just noticed that JForC has more information
> on this than I remembered; I don't think I got that far into it the
> first time around.
>
> Things that would help would be:
>
>   1. Better links to the documentation on packages.  It took me a
>      surprisingly long time to find the "Addons" page on the wiki.
>
>   2. Something like R's "Task Views" that give some introduction and
>      links to relavant packages for various higher-level topics.  See
>      http://cran.r-project.org/web/views/ for examples.
>
> Many descriptions of J focus on its mathematical calculator aspects,
> without giving much guidance for how to use it for "real work".
>
> Regards,
> Johann

[1] I had been at Morgan Stanley for a while, where I got to deal with
the lingering remnants of A+ and be impressed by how nice kdb+ was at
dealing with large sets of mortgage data.

[2] By this I mean understanding what exactly (require 'stats') does,
compared to (require 'stats/base') or (require
'~addons/stats/base/base.ijs').

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to