On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday 25 October 2014 10:21:25 Olivier Nyssen wrote: > > Like I said: why would we need a separate profile for IoT, which will be > > -by definition- common to all profiles ? > > Because your assumption is not valid. Why do you think IoT will be common > to > all profiles? Why do you assume that IoT will not have anything in > addition to > what's in common? Let me put it this way: if IoT is not an integral part of Tizen Common right from the start, we're shooting ourselves in the foot: "Tizen 3.0 Common is a common development / build / test platform for any upcoming features that may be needed by mobile, IVI, wearables, and other profiles." https://www.tizen.org/blogs/tsg/2014/first-tizen-3.0-common-milestone-release
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
