I think one of the problems that we will run into pretty fast is that
one of the definitions of Tizen Common is that it will contain features
that are Common between two or more profiles. Now if we look at the
Smartphone profile and the wearable profile that might be used by
something like the Samsung Gear S, then the overlap that is created and
inherited for Tizen Common will be immense, and will probably create a
Tizen Common that will encapsulate some core IoT aspects.
IoT by its own definition can vary immensely, but for a lot of "node"
type use cases we MAY find that Tizen Common could suffice, as we don't
need a UI. I think we have to see how Tizen Common will evolve.
My 2p worth.
Ash.
--
Ashiq Nazir
www.TizenExperts.com
[email protected]
On 26 Oct 2014, at 15:40, Leon Anavi wrote:
Hi Olivier,
On 2014-10-26 16:35, Olivier Nyssen wrote:
IoT = "an upcoming feature that may be needed by mobile, IVI,
wearables and other profiles"
With all due respect, I don't think I agree with you. The
specifications of Tizen profiles related to IoT should depend on the
different use cases. For example, in certain cases gadgets may require
headless Tizen (aka Tizen profile without any UI).
In my opinion Tizen:Common is not a profile which is suppoused to fit
all use cases. As far as I know it should be used as a base profile
which should be easily extended by new profiles depending on the
technical requirements of each specific case.
Best regards,
Leon
--
http://anavi.org/
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
