On Sunday 26 October 2014 04:21:00 Olivier Nyssen wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Saturday 25 October 2014 10:21:25 Olivier Nyssen wrote: > > > Like I said: why would we need a separate profile for IoT, which will be > > > -by definition- common to all profiles ? > > > > Because your assumption is not valid. Why do you think IoT will be common > > to > > all profiles? Why do you assume that IoT will not have anything in > > addition to > > what's in common? > > Let me put it this way: if IoT is not an integral part of Tizen Common > right from the start, we're shooting ourselves in the foot: > "Tizen 3.0 Common is a common development / build / test platform for any > upcoming features that may be needed by mobile, IVI, wearables, and other > profiles." > https://www.tizen.org/blogs/tsg/2014/first-tizen-3.0-common-milestone-releas > e
I'm not sure I agree with you and I don't see how quoting the definition of Common supports your case. The definition says it's a building block for the other profiles, it doesn't say that it is a full profile for a device. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
