Tizen Common is useful for many things. One of the reasons it is valuable is that it is not excessively constrained to a particular platform or purpose. Thus, when IOT infrastructure is available it can be included in Common even though that may not make a lot of sense to the people who want to use Tizen Common on their laptops. On the other hand, if you want to use a tablet as the controller for your smart house, it had better include the IOT infrastructure. The Common profile needs to be flexible to be generally useful. If you want a tablet profile that excludes IOT it needs to be defined. If you want a Home Controller profile that requires IOT, then that needs to be defined. Over specification of the Common profile would interfere with progress of Tizen.
From: General [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Olivier Nyssen Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 9:37 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Tizen General] Tizen Tablet Before we go any further, I would like to know if you guys agree with this basic logic: 1) Tizen Common is a common development / build / test platform for any upcoming features that may be needed by mobile, IVI, wearables, and other profiles. 2) IoT is an upcoming feature that may be needed by mobile, IVI, wearables, and other profiles. so: Tizen Common is a common development / build / test platform for IoT
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
