Wouldn't a vote with some kind of a clause be actually a 0 or -1 since the voter is not agreeing with the current vote in its entirety?
My vote is -1. I am actually for merging Lucene/Solr development but I feel that the current vote is too broad. I would vote for syncing Solr releases to Lucene releases but not the other way around. Bill On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > For those trying to keep track of the current voting, here is a list of the > Lucene/Solr committers and what I have seen of their votes thus far: > > Bill Au > Doug Cutting > Otis Gospodnetić > Erik Hatcher > Chris Hostetter > Grant Ingersoll - +1* > Mike Klaas > Shalin Shekhar Mangar - +1 > Ryan McKinley > Mark Miller - +1 > Noble Paul - +1 > Yonik Seeley - +1 > Koji Sekiguchi - +1 > Michael Busch > Doron Cohen > Mike McCandless - +1 > Bernhard Messer > Robert Muir - +1 > Uwe Schindler - +/-0 > Wolfgang Hoschek > Patrick O'Leary > Andi Vajda - +1* > Karl Wettin > Simon Willnauer - +1 > > * vote with some kind of clause (is that legal :) ) > > > -- > - Mark > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > >
