Who knows - this isn't the official count - just a gauge of what has
happened.
What the true votes of the *'s are remains to be seen - I wouldn't
default them either way
as the voters seemed to think they can vote with a clause - we don't
know what they would vote without. But right now they vote +1 with an
asterisk.
Again this is not the official count - and when we get an official
count, this would still have to then be ratified by the PMC.
On 03/04/2010 01:48 PM, Bill Au wrote:
Wouldn't a vote with some kind of a clause be actually a 0 or -1 since the
voter is not agreeing with the current vote in its entirety?
My vote is -1. I am actually for merging Lucene/Solr development but I feel
that the current vote is too broad. I would vote for syncing Solr releases
to Lucene releases but not the other way around.
Bill
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Mark Miller<markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
For those trying to keep track of the current voting, here is a list of the
Lucene/Solr committers and what I have seen of their votes thus far:
Bill Au
Doug Cutting
Otis Gospodnetić
Erik Hatcher
Chris Hostetter
Grant Ingersoll - +1*
Mike Klaas
Shalin Shekhar Mangar - +1
Ryan McKinley
Mark Miller - +1
Noble Paul - +1
Yonik Seeley - +1
Koji Sekiguchi - +1
Michael Busch
Doron Cohen
Mike McCandless - +1
Bernhard Messer
Robert Muir - +1
Uwe Schindler - +/-0
Wolfgang Hoschek
Patrick O'Leary
Andi Vajda - +1*
Karl Wettin
Simon Willnauer - +1
* vote with some kind of clause (is that legal :) )
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
