On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Mark Miller wrote:
Who knows - this isn't the official count - just a gauge of what has
happened.
What the true votes of the *'s are remains to be seen - I wouldn't default
them either way as the voters seemed to think they can vote with a clause
- we don't know what they would vote without. But right now they vote +1
with an asterisk.
Indeed. In my case, if the hard synchronisation of releases in both
directions were to become a hard requirement, I would probably vote -1.
I'm +1 with making it a requirement that in order to release Solr we'd have
to release Lucene too.
I am -1 making it a requirement that in order to release Lucene we'd
have to release Solr too.
Infrequent releases have been a problem on Lucene and, apparently, an even
worse one on Solr. Until Solr has shown that it can release as frequently as
Lucene I don't think slowing down Lucene releases even more is a good move.
I think that merging the projects as proposed would make it a easier for
Solr to improve its release frequency, though. This my +1 vote on the rest
of the proposal.
Andi..
