Hey Doug, Doesn't this move towards having a shared code base, and more so the criteria for that of a TLP? Thoughts?
Cheers, Chris On 3/4/10 3:08 PM, "Doug Cutting" <cutt...@apache.org> wrote: Uwe Schindler wrote: > One idea: If we really make solr depend on the new lucene lib, solr > should not have lucene jars in its lib folder, but instead the > nightly build should fetch the jars from the lucene hudson build. If Solr trunk is meant to always be based on Lucene trunk, then shouldn't they both be under a single trunk? A Solr release would then not include an independent version of Lucene, but would rather be an alternate avenue for releasing the Lucene code. One could tag, branch and release them separately or together. If separately, then a Solr release tag might include a version of Lucene that's never released independently. Doug ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
