On Friday 21 November 2003 21:34, William Kenworthy wrote: > as a user I'd object to that. I think that accept all is the best > default as that would seem to be the most useful and popular path. > Otherwise, you may as well install debian if you are going to force > restrictions on people out of the box. > > Keep in mind that gentoo is about choice, and not forcing people to go > down a minority path, but also to allow people to choose that path if > they want to. Agreed. If it were implemented, I'd also think that keeping the default portage behaviour the same as it is now to be the best path. Otherwise, too many "what happened?" type questions. Jason -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Paul de Vrieze
- [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo internal structure Sergey V. Spiridonov
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure Brett I. Holcomb
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal struct... Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal struct... Aron Griffis
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal st... Sven Vermeulen
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo intern... donnie berkholz
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Erik Swanson
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... William Kenworthy
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Matthew Kennedy
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Jon Portnoy
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Erik Swanson
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Paul de Vrieze
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Chris Gianelloni
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Mike Frysinger
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Aron Griffis
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Chris Gianelloni
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Luke-Jr
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo in... Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
