On Friday 21 November 2003 19:07, Erik Swanson wrote: > On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 09:32, Jon Portnoy wrote: > > The social contract states that Gentoo Linux will never _depend_ on > > nonfree software. However, we still provide it. If we moved over to a > > Debian-esque "if you want nonfree software, you need to change settings" > > it would irritate a decently large number of people. > > My suggestion of a conservative default was under the assumption that it > would be trivial to accept additional licenses. An interactive "y" after > being shown the license, for example. I agree that a more liberal > default would be in order if it required substantial effort (such as > editing make.conf) to accept additional licenses.
I don't want interactive "y"'s as in that case I cannot redirect my output to a logfile anymore. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
