On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 09:32, Jon Portnoy wrote: > The social contract states that Gentoo Linux will never _depend_ on > nonfree software. However, we still provide it. If we moved over to a > Debian-esque "if you want nonfree software, you need to change settings" > it would irritate a decently large number of people.
My suggestion of a conservative default was under the assumption that it would be trivial to accept additional licenses. An interactive "y" after being shown the license, for example. I agree that a more liberal default would be in order if it required substantial effort (such as editing make.conf) to accept additional licenses. -- Erik Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
