On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:30:14 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:37:49 +0100 Ernst Herzberg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Nice messages, all with wrong or not existent signatures. > > Kmail and Evo are currently b0rked with respect to certain signatures. > There's a reasonable chance that the sig on this message will look duff > to anyone using one of those broken clients, even though it's valid. I'll just add that sylpheed-claws has broken gnupg support with gnupg-1.4.x. Its devs say it only works with 0.3.x, but I only started to have problems after upgrading to 1.4.x. Most sigs get verified correctly, some don't. And recently, people have been telling me that my mails are signed incorrectly. So I stopped signing them for the time being and am not sure what to do. I've considered a MTA change, but there is nothing else I'd find convenient enough to use. Guess I'm just spoiled by SC. :) -- /~\ The ASCII Andrej "Ticho" Kacian <ticho at gentoo dot org> \ / Ribbon Campaign GnuPG public key ID: 7CD93FE2 (pgp.mit.edu) X Against HTML Key fingerprint: / \ Email! E87D 9DEF 2A23 6FFB 7AD9 542F 4253 3A46 7CD9 3FE2 -- [email protected] mailing list
