Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Tue Jan 18 2005, 03:30:14AM EST] > Kmail and Evo are currently b0rked with respect to certain signatures. > There's a reasonable chance that the sig on this message will look duff > to anyone using one of those broken clients, even though it's valid.
Dan Armak wrote: [Tue Jan 18 2005, 06:07:46AM EST] > Yeah, even with kmail from kde 3.4.0beta1 :-( I'm not convinced Ciaran's statement is correct. The message shows up invalid in mutt as well. Dan's signature, produced with kmail, worked fine. Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer
pgppVf0jtntGh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
