On Wednesday 19 January 2005 04:25, Aron Griffis wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Tue Jan 18 2005, 03:30:14AM EST] > > > Kmail and Evo are currently b0rked with respect to certain signatures. > > There's a reasonable chance that the sig on this message will look duff > > to anyone using one of those broken clients, even though it's valid. > > Dan Armak wrote: [Tue Jan 18 2005, 06:07:46AM EST] > > > Yeah, even with kmail from kde 3.4.0beta1 :-( > > I'm not convinced Ciaran's statement is correct. The message shows up > invalid in mutt as well. Dan's signature, produced with kmail, worked > fine.
Same here (kmail 1.7.2 (from kde 3.3.2)). Even though sometimes an even more broken mime-defang breaks the signatures (so I never know why a signature is invalid) Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpeVuurXZUMO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
