On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:25:32 -0500 Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Tue Jan 18 2005, 03:30:14AM EST] | > Kmail and Evo are currently b0rked with respect to certain | > signatures. There's a reasonable chance that the sig on this message | > will look duff to anyone using one of those broken clients, even | > though it's valid. | | Dan Armak wrote: [Tue Jan 18 2005, 06:07:46AM EST] | > Yeah, even with kmail from kde 3.4.0beta1 :-( | | I'm not convinced Ciaran's statement is correct. The message shows up | invalid in mutt as well. Dan's signature, produced with kmail, worked | fine.
Mmmm, ok, how about this one? It's possible that -claws is *also* broken, and that 1.0 just fixed it, in which case they need to write better changelogs :) -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpqpvxBBuUvF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
