On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:10:39 +0100
Torsten Veller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> * Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Kmail and Evo are currently b0rked with respect to certain
> > > signatures. There's a reasonable chance that the sig on this
> > > message will look duff to anyone using one of those broken
> > > clients, even though it's valid.
> >
> > I'll just add that sylpheed-claws has broken gnupg support with
> > gnupg-1.4.x. Its devs say it only works with 0.3.x, but I only
> > started to have problems after upgrading to 1.4.x. Most sigs get
> > verified correctly, some don't. And recently, people have been
> > telling me that my mails are signed incorrectly. So I stopped
> > signing them for the time being and am not sure what to do. I've
> > considered a MTA change, but there is nothing else I'd find
> > convenient enough to use. Guess I'm just spoiled by SC. :)
> 
> Yes, it's a sylpheed-claws problem: it doesn't encode trailing
> whitespaces.
> Sypheed-claws is not the only broken client. I think there is a fix
> for thunderbird in bugzilla and gnus was also wrong.
> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59436>
> 
> If gpg-1.4 users remove all trailing whitespaces from ciaran's email
> it verifies most often correct but has a broken signature delimiter.

Seems to be fixed in sylpheed-claws-1.0, although not noted in the
ChangeLog.

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

Attachment: pgpGInZysJ0sZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to