On Tuesday 18 January 2005 16:09, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 05:37 +0100, Ernst Herzberg wrote: > > Nice messages, all with wrong or not existent signatures. > > Try another keyserver. I believe most of the developers use pgp.mit.edu > as their keyserver.
I'm using hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net (or de.pgp.net, or serch.keyserver.net...), and all servers syncronise very fast. Eample the key from daniel Goller, he has uploaded the key, and now i am able to verfify his message successful. Doug's signs are still bad, but the key seems to be valid, previous messages dont had this problems. If a message has a bad sign, this message is _invalid_. If a softwareproblem raises this probles, don't use it. If everybody or most people ignores wrong signs, something goes completly wrong... Another question: Why are keys from new developer are no signed? A minimun of one another dev must have trust him, or not? :-) <Earny>
pgp39n8cWjZ3D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
