On Saturday 10 June 2006 10:29, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 18:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > This is the "official" (hehe) request for comments on making a policy > > > of how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server > > > and how to allow for building client-only. > > > > rather than moving to some sort of policy that satisfies no one > > completely and we'll have to back out of later, why dont we wait until > > portage can give us proper support for USE=client/server > > Got an ETA? > > The situation we have now is confusing, at best, to our users, and > something really should be done to resolve it.
sure, dont add support for the flags at all at this point, problem solved USE=minimal has no real definition, no point in trying to iron one out imo -mike
pgpKXsIMY6zIf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
