On Friday 28 July 2006 06:02, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:35:24AM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > Mike asked you repeatedly to voice your issues or concerns in relation > > to Project Sunrise, which you failed to reply to. > > How many times are we supposed to raise our concerns about a project > whose founders already agreed to run their project as an unofficial > project on non-gentoo infrastructure? Did you miss the logs from the > devrel + sunrise meeting where genstef and jokey agreed to this?
as the thread on gentoo-dev was named:
sunrise, a temporary compromise
looks to me like most people (rightly) thought of the meeting as resulting in
a temporary solution
> I simply had no idea the Gentoo Council even remotely considered
> taking Project Sunrise on as an official project.
complete garbage
if you arent reading the e-mails on the gentoo-dev list which were in reply to
your own postings, then that is simply your own fault ... i was cc-ing you to
make sure you saw those e-mails, and your reaction was:
PS: There is no need to CC: me on replies. Please use reply-to-list.
> > Also, I do not remember you even attending the meeting or asking to
> > speak there, so this really seems a tad unreasonable or impulsive.
>
> Same as above - had I known
same as above, complete garbage
> that you guys actually intended to revert
> your own ruling from the previous meeting along with the consensus
> reached on the devrel + sunrise meeting I would have been there to
> raise my concerns.
reverting a temporary suspension ? what a crazy idea
there were many threads asking for people to look at the latest Sunrise state
and comment/complain/whatever with no more negative responses ... if
developers arent posting negative feedback and issues appear to be resolved
on gentoo-dev, then what else would you expect the Council to do ?
-mike
pgpRYVA6YVCsw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
