On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:56:36AM +0000, Steve Long wrote: > Ryan Hill wrote: > > I agree, though year of birth might be interesting. Income and children > > are a bit too private. > > > ++ in general although I do think parenthood (if responsible) is as relevant > as age. A 28 year old with a 5 year old kid has a lot to show a 35 year old > doctoral student with no kids, even if it's not all technical. # of kids > isn't relevant. I put # of kids in there as a lark, perhaps it might be better as 'do you have children', with an eye to seeing how it affects their package choices - see games and education packages for kids, plus the previous USE=offensive debate on the desktop backgrounds with scantily-clad woman.
> Maybe it's not something you want to ask the users, but it would be more > interesting wrt devs, as would statistics on standard Equal Ops monitoring > (a legal requirement on employers in the UK, even if the person declines to > answer, which is ofc their right.) Go some good links on that? They might have good question wording we can borrow? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
Description: PGP signature