On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:56:24 Petteri Räty wrote: > Patrick Lauer wrote: > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote: > >> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +0000, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет: > >>> patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46 > >>> Log: > >>> Bump > >>> > >>> file : > >>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/ > >>>fo remost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > >>> > >>> Index: foremost-1.5.6.ebuild > >>> =================================================================== > >>> > >>> inherit eutils toolchain-funcs > >>> > >>> DESCRIPTION="A console program to recover files based on their headers > >>> and footers" HOMEPAGE="http://foremost.sourceforge.net/"; > >>> #SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz" > >>> # starting to hate sf.net ... > >>> SRC_URI="http://foremost.sourceforge.net/pkg/foremost-1.5.6.tar.gz"; > >> > >> Patrick, do you remember the answer on question number 1 in end-quiz? > > > > Yeah, and if sf.net would even tangentially try to work I might care. > > Took me long enough to get a file out of it, and if I feel like it I > > might even fix that SRC_URI to make people happy. > > Ah well. Since they love changing paths around it won't work for the next > > bump anyway ... > > The filename that violates our policies hasn't changed between the new > and old SRC_URI. > Correct. Just the PATH. Which is not the filename.
And because I'm a lazy bum I copypasta'ed it out of the mess the sourceforge people call a website. And then I even managed to fetch that file after 3 or 4 tries, so I was happy to have gotten it and cared more to see if it works. So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long walk on the beach and doesn't return for quite some time. At least I'm trying to keep these packages alive, which noone else seems to do.
