On 03/03/2010 07:45 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I don't think there was any such problem until poppler maintainers
> decided to unsplit poppler into one big packages with USE flags again
> instead of the nice split poppler, poppler-glib (that should have been
> named poppler-cairo probably instead), poppler-qt3, poppler-qt4 and
> poppler-utils.

If we could manage to convince poppler upstream that would be nice to
actually provide bindings packages aside a core one...



Luca Barbato

Reply via email to