On 04/30/2011 11:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 04/30/2011 07:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> >> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is >> not useful information to them >> >> So no, I won't start cluttering up ChangeLogs and I would prefer if >> others would stop it as well >> > > > Individual developers (especially QA project members) should not be > ignoring policies when they feel like it. > > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html > > If you want to try and change the policy then put it on the agenda of > the next council meeting as there does not seem to be a consensus > backing your opinion. Until then everyone is expected to play by the rules. > > Petteri >
It no where in the link you provided mentions ChangeLog is required for removals. Removing an unused ebuild is not the same as making changes to an ebuild. We have no policy for logging removals. And that's like it should be.
