On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:30:06 +0100 Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote: > > You can NOT > > I am not saying that it is a good idea, but of course you can. It has > pretty sucky effects on how your library can be used, disabling > various smart stuff that modern systems do, but I guess the upstream > practises may be from a different time. No, you can not do it because I will not let you. > > Somebody sane please fix this. > > I both agree and I don't. I guess it will be difficult for > representatives from a given distribution to "fix" very much > upstream, if possible I think that the distribution should instead be > fixed to deal with the limits imposed by upstream practises. I think you're missing something here. This breakage was added to the Gentoo ebuild by the "maintainer". In fact, it immediately follows a bit of code that sanitizes compiler flags from the pkg-config files, which was added *specifically so we don't run into issues like this*. > In this case I think it means the EAPI reverse dependency rebuild discussion. Again, this has absolutely nothing to do with what I'm talking about. -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets we were never more here, expanse getting broader @ gentoo.org but bigger boats been done by less water
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
