On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:47:09 +0100 "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013, 23:20:50 schrieben Sie: > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0100 > > > > "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for > > > now all with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you > > > request developer profile checking). > > > > > > This means the procedure below is complete up to and including point 5) > > > now. > > > > > > Please consider changing your profile symlink manually and testing the > > > new profile tree. In case of problems, please file a bug and assign it > > > to me (or tell me if I'm around). > > > > > > If all goes well, we'll continue in a week. > > > > Hmm, I think we need a bit more fine-grained EAPI=5 directories, at > > least for arch-specific unmasks. Not sure if I shall use the > > arch-specific 13.0 profiles or something more common shall be > > introduced. > > I think it's perfectly fine now to raise the EAPI to 5 anywhere in the > profile > trees that (also) inherit 13.0 (since they need it anyway). > > So, in my opinion, we can just do that wherever needed. > > The intention of the "eapi-5-files" directory is just to hold the files that > will be moved into global scale once the old profiles are gone. Well, in this particular case I'm wondering if there shouldn't be a similar solution for the arch/*. In other words arch/*/eapi-5-files which will be moved to main arch scope once the old profiles are gone. But I guess we could just move the files from default/linux/*/13.0. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
