-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

You also have to rename the PATCHES array, because base.eclass already
uses that name with epatch.

And I can't say I am thrilled about the idea that we duplicate
functionality again. It's already confusing enough the way it is (I
can tell, because I review ebuilds in sunrise regularly. What might
look trivial to us, is confusing for regular contributors). We should
put more effort into providing centralized functions and deprecate old
stuff.
But I have a feeling that providing a second patch function with
reduced functionality will not help with that.

I don't think it's too bad to include the automatic -p# detection,
because it can be overridden anyway. The cases where you really need
to do that are rare enough to leave detection as default.

Also I don't think it's too bad to drop some functionality and still
not rename the function, so that we have slightly different epatch
behavior in EAPI=6. That can be communicated and old ebuilds will
still use eutils epatch for older EAPIs.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRXCGaAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzDWMIAI3aU5w+FGEtWTfkQ5FkldDp
1UJhseirhYxQqRykZJoKdWCSRPqQbUCThbkLoiHvPsvsSr4Os6lR3Ycyfzs0U5di
ZxNfuL3ykyB42mbkh+YpHwAFr6B6FdPxVoz0XKlpKVM5LDgUDqHmNrd+s3v8/n/D
XYGOf95DCtOnZbiINfn5jvf63L9R9Cp95cFqbv0xphVt5yIjD3f9xJsXWfclwcuS
6S3FrIpMF94x6howB/Z4ifQrh9oWy4ivB6mGlOcadTDzhBZkY2/aM25nLg3zW0h7
nSd8KASR3wVYYwWKntyUxoWdkQ49JbkC+WAv1X9VingpA8NPkvtqfx54WDtTc3I=
=zKvF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to