-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/03/2013 05:29 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:30 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> You also have to rename the PATCHES array, because base.eclass
>> already uses that name with epatch.
> 
> base.eclass should have died a horrible death a long time ago. A
> new EAPI is an excellent opportunity to ban it.
> 

That is not possible without the agreement of the eclass maintainers.
So you cannot just "ban" an eclass.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRXGGXAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz7DMH/0crt8ANEKsqp6WsB4mAs7Vr
7g7Q+nGdvsXyfXVaU9o65S7hFANElXUsYYt5pyOliO2bQVKyGxIxKDO5WPdcJfVO
rEwEtCLAJrrknMa8TlHol7tAkcXCCCFlM0OZYvGJFJPaaOTwq7bRhdqEN2xoGOJy
xW+aDLuhmS38dxGHiRP8s3BsD/8vuNDDCETOKfbid9SSjoB3HlhzM/4Um5bzsu+y
XwUQLU+VndcSqa45PHYl8ai9JFxRDmwNSutA7jkzJ2ogksJ1rbZ5bzIUyTxnpyqu
2qbfcEjD0UQ9OF80p14OJzJdxOzYu9p0ATH37iVXgSvYQdGOle0Y2IUctYd60p0=
=MnS5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to