On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:36:07 +0200
Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:14:37 +0200
> Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Therefore, I ask you: how should we name the new (and simpler) patch
> > applying function which will be provided in EAPI 6?
> 
> My propositions:
> 
> - apply_patches ...
> - apply_user_patches
> 
> Where I think we used the latter name when discussing adding user patch
> support.

blech too long, underscores.  how about dopatch?

if at all possible, please keep EPATCH_EXCLUDE around.  it's just too damned
useful.


-- 
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to