On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:56:29 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dne St 3. dubna 2013 16:29:48, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:30 +0200 > > hasufell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You also have to rename the PATCHES array, because base.eclass already > > > uses that name with epatch. > > > > > > base.eclass should have died a horrible death a long time ago. A new > > EAPI is an excellent opportunity to ban it. > > > > This is actually good idea to ban the base.eclass usage, but wonder how > complex it would make all the eclasses that currently inherit it. I think EAPI 6 should export all the means necessary to reimplement the missing parts of it, inclusing user docs install and patch application functions. Is there anything else that would be necessary? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
