-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:06:31 +0200 hasufell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/03/2013 05:29 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:30 +0200 hasufell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> You also have to rename the PATCHES array, because base.eclass > >> already uses that name with epatch. > > > > base.eclass should have died a horrible death a long time ago. A > > new EAPI is an excellent opportunity to ban it. > > > > That is not possible without the agreement of the eclass maintainers. > So you cannot just "ban" an eclass.
QA certainly can, and should. Or failing that, the Council can step in. - -- Ciaran McCreesh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFcYVIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhG7nwCcCLClcG0etUSBuFAupj1nmJMw iQIAoKxQMWsqEKwp7NRTUqAPbQNIeXFk =33rM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
