It's happening that we seem to have a bunch of crybabies in Gentoo that don't get along together and instead of figuring out their differences are going to screw up users even more.
Bunch of chipmunks in our ranks as well I suppose. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:43 PM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> I am sending this out for review so we can commit it to the tree >> when we commit our alternate systemd ebuild in a few days. This will be >> set up so that users can choose which systemd package they want to >> install, and it will default to the current systemd package. > > Did I miss some kind of announcement for what is going on here? An > additional implementation in portage along with an eclass probably is > worth some kind of intro on-list. I don't think you need to seek > approval/etc, but it would be nice to know what your goals/etc are. > Is this just a different installation/configuration approach, or is > this some kind of upstream fork? > > Rich >
