On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote: >> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project >> leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case there >> has not been any activity for a while, regardless of the internal >> project structure. > >> Authority does not only come with knowledge, but also with >> commitment. > >> If no one disagrees, then we should add this to the list of >> undertakers competence. > > > We already check for inactive members (developers and leaders are the > same for us) > > What's is this thread for? > >
You probably misunderstood. I didn't mean inactive in general, but inactive in a _project_.
