-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote: > On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote: >>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project >>> leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case >>> there has not been any activity for a while, regardless of the >>> internal project structure. >> >>> Authority does not only come with knowledge, but also with >>> commitment. >> >>> If no one disagrees, then we should add this to the list of >>> undertakers competence. >> >> >> We already check for inactive members (developers and leaders are >> the same for us) >> >> What's is this thread for? >> >> > > You probably misunderstood. I didn't mean inactive in general, but > inactive in a _project_. >
Err no. That's not our job. If the project has an inactive leader or member it's the leaders job (or team's job if the leader is inactive) to sort this out internally. If that fails, then they should seek help. undertakers do not have (and neither want) the authority to remove active developers from certain projects. If a project appears to be dead even though it's members (and/or leader) are active in other Gentoo areas, and they refuse to fix the situation, you may want to take this to the Council. Seem like you need to re-read http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html - -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSXanBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzNTVDNDczOUYzRjJEMTRGNDRGMzU2RkMw OUJGNEY1NEMyQkE3RjNDAAoJEAm/T1TCun886OIP/0cJDlFzV1lWryYscHXW+FqR gQUlfcLDa1TQWJqvWZjPxE5RoeOpAfxf55nTYWX800vlIngnjALLTlOD4kqE/Hp6 uKZ6ydgSljvcR5aKJYGV4QVVn5NWis4eC8jGiGqdw47K6HxHGH6U9sPDzIxyH0YZ 2Nznq9LOTTHM0YONpHNiKJrv8xytKJcdOElTUpHUMBWru9xrpeYfdB3VsTBxQHaQ l9lymVL1DsK5m8+iPXvk86K/D2swFo5uitt1DU5GY+ttWaJWG2e8tIx5pySXtsVv j35pmCCmQ5VuBsYRLA5gMwhY2xdnHsQWwMe3jVtcxHpf3bqIkI1WE0Ahx55fz/1d 8RVEyyAkNFbZT2hF5w6r+X/+AeOD2FMKFGrTCQoaKQGg0wxvUGniKp2A4TTcHNcF bdF16cFRVEFQSghmr3w3OJLLFnqjw8ojwPptoYbfyCcw0tDKcPAmy2KjRA/7pmO2 aH8FEEAZkI1brWGpAoWrCoE+O51hDbeYWWZgbMmzCM2dPMZnP0c0tyaVRzKlRHC5 3YERUyedl6UzwV2Q195JGFbJz5jmZwr6VXKj5cvlTjNFcZdOriphIIXgnEQlGG1z 8ib8eitlFLeIR0gaMB+BMEjm76+lDLOYfKqVhJQ1zJGimzR3gwEfSO9j4gYodOO8 GkAq1vbv65NJjGrN0j9l =oLpu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
