-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/15/2013 11:00 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 09:53 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>>> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>>>>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive 
>>>>>> project leaders/members and remove them from the
>>>>>> projects in case there has not been any activity for a
>>>>>> while, regardless of the internal project structure.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Authority does not only come with knowledge, but also
>>>>>> with commitment.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> If no one disagrees, then we should add this to the list
>>>>>> of undertakers competence.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> We already check for inactive members (developers and 
>>>>> leaders are the same for us)
>>>>> 
>>>>> What's is this thread for?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
> 
>>>> You probably misunderstood. I didn't mean inactive in
>>>> general, but inactive in a _project_.
> 
> 
>>> Err no. That's not our job. If the project has an inactive 
>>> leader or member it's the leaders job (or team's job if the 
>>> leader is inactive) to sort this out internally. If that
>>> fails, then they should seek help. undertakers do not have (and
>>> neither want) the authority to remove active developers from
>>> certain projects. If a project appears to be dead even though
>>> it's members (and/or leader) are active in other Gentoo areas,
>>> and they refuse to fix the situation, you may want to take this
>>> to the Council. Seem like you need to re-read
> 
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html
> 
> 
> 
>> I have read that and that is why I propose that undertakers do 
>> also check projects for their internal activity patterns.
> 
>> I don't really think that is a job for the council.
> 
> 
> Sorry it's not going to happen.

ok.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXa7MAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz9p8H/iBE3B5vQfqhWcd8vMwyG8oI
5bjkQ/7Dq1CVPB/7h16oR6fiSauI5I2d+PNL/uSTacfA0j1SVsUEtWKjeMM5eL2u
1doyB/o+z6Bww5LNYjnH/F8jHloJP/83bNmpDJZS/Mqb+0TrJ61EeimLcEBTBn7m
1laT8ulxsIwypD/Blut7zcsvUQoazE9JlnLONO7i6eRMS0vEJLJTiHmSKLDB4Fv5
xoqvMJG5/6c1+EgKQzPxGUN0wo6Zw8aLTpSUkcYnacAAKzm+HGtBpvze2G1pv7eF
Cu6XD4SHC9MMrKjdbxRyHso2f3N38sMC7SDnLKEOrrNus/M+OGtY25iv7zAQkmY=
=gA6U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to