-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote: >> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: >>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote: >>>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive >>>> project leaders/members and remove them from the projects in >>>> case there has not been any activity for a while, regardless >>>> of the internal project structure. >>> >>>> Authority does not only come with knowledge, but also with >>>> commitment. >>> >>>> If no one disagrees, then we should add this to the list of >>>> undertakers competence. >>> >>> >>> We already check for inactive members (developers and leaders >>> are the same for us) >>> >>> What's is this thread for? >>> >>> > >> You probably misunderstood. I didn't mean inactive in general, >> but inactive in a _project_. > > > Err no. That's not our job. If the project has an inactive leader > or member it's the leaders job (or team's job if the leader is > inactive) to sort this out internally. If that fails, then they > should seek help. undertakers do not have (and neither want) the > authority to remove active developers from certain projects. If a > project appears to be dead even though it's members (and/or leader) > are active in other Gentoo areas, and they refuse to fix the > situation, you may want to take this to the Council. Seem like you > need to re-read > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html > >
I have read that and that is why I propose that undertakers do also check projects for their internal activity patterns. I don't really think that is a job for the council. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXatIAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzyeYH/0kg9I/SGmwXMTbjMcAQ5BOU xKAHhR2NrlqSdrZxGH55bS0L8wkxTj8WgTD8xV85s58Oa+koSMV8s4Fwg1myiyLK hxfip31BCLgTDEuWuQ8rMMYmPmpOgrN4s/Q0VlZSRxZOyLbJLHbgFoWkykYg04Ks PS85Ox3zdGPmFEMjkPjcqrAeYAPVY/ug/Dm81JOdn4kwlt+3zEK3zplAVznTm5nN qhdJJtDqOkBJcBC477EVqTQh6zyCEoOcwXF+vhUg3JGpN3ebQrYqLKIXlD1oYiTL VP93R/bh0QKYe6JjUhMhUQqWYVSIDD5ChQ4c6V2uJRT1JqwO2qdV0+lv98MEafM= =6gJs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
